Archive Page 110

Talking to…Photojournalist Anthony Karen

Photos courtesy of Anthony Karen

Whether it’s humility, patience, diligence or daring, New York-based photographer Anthony Karen has a personality that’s ideally suited to a photojournalist — because somehow he infiltrates enclaves and subcultures that are notoriously closed off, among them the Ku Klux Klan, shantytowns in Haiti and one of the few surviving leaders of Cambodia’s murderous Khmer Rouge regime.

After listening to a recent NPR interview with Karen, we were curious to know more about his start, his style and his process.

Interview by babydiscarted and discarted.

Why do you take photos?

I used to take photographs because I wanted to; now I also take them because I need to. I have to express myself in some creative way to feel alive — photojournalism allows me to do so many things. It fills my soul to experience the gift of being allowed into someone’s most private moments and the trust they give me to try and capture what’s going on the best that I can. It’s the beauty of creation, going home and seeing what I’ve captured on film. It’s not always a great image, but it’s a moment of time that I’ll always have access to. I can make that experience last forever. And I like to make people “feel” — hopefully it’s not a feeling to blog [about] me and say my images suck, but photography is so subjective. So what can ya do!

Continue reading ‘Talking to…Photojournalist Anthony Karen’

Spy Photographer Thwarted at Car Shoot

This is funny. I happened upon this post on motortrend.com that details the exploits of an automotive spy photographer (is that an official title?).

The guy, operating under the name Ringo Kamens, says he came across a super-secretive car photography shoot in downtown Denver, and his attempts at getting shots of the yet-to-be-released car got him in hot water with the crew. They berated him, saying they had a permit and no outside photography was allowed. Then they called over plainclothes officers who told him he wasn’t allowed to shoot on city property. He willingly left once they tried to take his camera and threatened him with arrest.

Too bad Kamens didn’t know the laws protecting his rights to shoot the shoot — permit or no, city property or no. Kamens actually had every right to take those photos.

Nobody was up in arms over this trampling of his rights though. Commenters were more concerned with guessing the make and model of the car. (Most people think it was the Audi A4 Avant.)

Article via Motor Trend

Read Ringo’s account of what happened here.

Gorilla Photographer

South African photojournalist Brent Stirton was recently interviewed by NPR about his work photographing endangered gorillas that were murdered in the Democratic Republic of Congo. His famous shot of a dead 500-pound gorilla being carried out of the Virunga National Park after having been shot by unknown assailants appeared in Newsweek in July 2007. It’s also part of National Geographic’s July cover story, which investigates the mysterious killings of seven mountain gorillas in what was supposed to be a protected sanctuary. The pictures are completely arresting and worth a look.

Listen to the NPR interview here.

Read the National Geographic story here.

Cop Commandeers Camera in Coral Gables


Photo by sunrise954

Like the story of the photographer in Coney Island we posted on last week, here’s another incidence of a person being asked to hand over their film by law enforcement. Momoko Sudo was taking nature photos in her Coral Gables, FL, neighborhood when she snapped one of a police motorcycle. The officer, who Sudo says was abusive and confrontational, demanded to see her camera, deleted all her pictures and threw her memory card on the ground.

She thinks the officer was not only suspicious that she was a foreigner taking photos but put off by her outfit (a large sunhat and bandanna with Japanese writing) and the fact that her camera settings were in Japanese.

It’s unfortunate Sudo didn’t get the officer’s name or badge number because he seems completely unprofessional and inappropriate. Assuredly this is not the policy of the Coral Gables Police Department (Franklin of Artblog.net has a letter in to them to make sure). But it’s just another reminder that no one, in pretty much any circumstance, has the right to ask for your film or your camera.

Article from Artblog.net via Carlos Miller

Andrews International Execs Remain Silent Over Guards’ Aggressive Behavior


Photo by discarted
NOTE: This guard did not have anything to do with the incident.

Dear Mr. Andrews:

I wanted to write again regarding an incident with your security personnel because it seems as if you didn’t receive my last letter. At the very minimum, this is a customer service issue, and it’s shocking that you wouldn’t want to address, much less acknowledge, a situation where your security team’s actions have been questioned.

I am referring to what happened between myself and your security guards at the Hollywood and Highland Metro station where I was harassed, threatened with arrest and cursed at for taking photographs. In case you are unaware, Andrews International security are notorious for overstepping the limits of their authority and harassing people in Hollywood. There are extremely few laws that restrict photography in public places, and they’re mostly relating to military installations or people with an expectation of privacy (i.e., in their homes). National Press Photographers Association (NPPA) attorneys have issued a memorandum on the subject that says in part:

+ There is no federal law that would prohibit photography in public places or restrict photography of public places and/or structures.

+ Any restrictions that the government does impose would need to have supporting evidence that it was essential for public safety. The burden is on the government;

Presumably you are thinking that the issue will just go away, but I’d like you to know that photographers will continue to shoot in public spaces in and around Hollywood since it is our legal right to do so. What’s more, now that we have a small movement going, this issue is on the radar, and it’s more than likely that your guards will unnecessarily and inappropriately detain photographers in the future. So my suggestion to you is to train your security force on the laws so that a situation doesn’t escalate unnecessarily.

Sincerely,
Shawn Nee

To contact Andrews International executives regarding this incident click here.

POTW: The Egyptian


Photo by discarted

I will happily admit that I am not any kind of expert when it comes to dissecting what makes a good image. I am completely self-taught in regards to photography and read very little about the subject, so I lack any type of historical knowledge or grasp on photographic theories. Either I innately like an image or I don’t.

To kick off the Picture of the Week (POTW) and to force myself to start thinking more critically about my images, and others as well, I chose this photo for a few reasons:

1. The composition is good — I think. The lines and the paint along the pavement lead you right to the man’s face. His face and body are in perfect focus while the background has a slight blur, forcing you to concentrate on him.

2. The exposure and focus are dead-on, with his face landing in the the center of the gradation scale from light to dark.

3. The man, who is Egyptian, is a captivating subject. His glance, along with the cigarette and his clothing and bracelet, just pull you in. Looking at the image for the first time, I feel as though we are crossing paths once again, establishing a brief connection between strangers. It also seems like he knows something that I don’t.

Comments and critiques are welcomed. Especially from the photo editors.

Paparazzi vs. Surfers: Bedlam on the Beach

A pack of surfers that attacked paparazzi (twice) on a Malibu beach, in defense of Matthew McConaughey no less, has gotten a lot of buzz over the last day or so, with reactions ranging from “What intrusive, blood-sucking scumbags” to “Beaches are public places and don’t go to Malibu for seclusion and privacy.”

In my view, the photographers should be able to shoot on public property if they’re not breaking any laws. Driving like lunatics, chasing celebs, trespassing, etc., they should be fined or arrested. But I’m on the paps’ side on this one. It’s basically a photographers’ rights issue. And not all paps suck. The surfers were acting like a bunch of thugs, and Malibu locals/surfers are known for doing this to any outsider on “their” beach. I mean, the surfers walked the entire length of the beach to start a fight with them. They were the aggressors and should be arrested.

To view it from a different angle, how would you feel if you were on Hollywood Blvd. and a bunch of guys walked the entire block and jumped you because they didn’t like you taking a photo of somebody they were hanging out with?

 

Day Two of the Paps vs. Surfers:

 

 

 

The Bruce Gilden Experiment in Color

Shawn Nee / discarted

In recent weeks Bruce Gilden, a New York City photographer and Magnum Photos full member since 2002, has been receiving some well deserved attention via the internet. A short film was recently produced by Benjamen Walker and Andrea Silenzi for WYNC’s Streetshots, emerging flickr groups have been inspired by him, and message boards have been buzzing with praise and disdain for his work and style.

As for myself, I had never heard of Bruce Gilden until a friend of mine sent me a link to Benjamen and Andrea’s short. And within seconds of clicking play and hearing the first syllable resonate from the back of Gilden’s throat — I was hooked. I didn’t even have to see a single photo. But once I finally did see a Gilden image, I knew I had to try imitate it. Thus, became the The Bruce Gilden Experiment; the first in a series of postings where I set out to produce work inspired by and similar to the photographers that I admire.

While conducting The Bruce Gilden Experiment, and along with fighting my innate tendencies to shoot in my usual way (which, nonetheless, is starting to bore me), I found it difficult, except for the above photo, to capture an image within a foot of a person’s face that I could truly appreciate, or want to call my own.

Maybe it was the 24mm L series lens I chose to use. Maybe it was the choice of using color film, something I very rarely do, or Gilden does. Or maybe it was my narcisistic belief that I could produce work on par with Gilden while trying to imitate a style that is completely uncharacteristic of my own. I don’t even own a flash, nor do I know how to use one. And I’ll probably never learn how to operate one because that is something I am simply not interested in learning…for now at least.

After about an hour of shooting around the Hollywod and Highland area and processing the rolls at Rite Aid (which develops film as good, or even better, than most of the professional labs in LA) and then scanning them at home, the majority of the images were either out of focus, or more importantly, lacked the astounding beauty associated with a Gilden image. Overall, I could say it was extremely disappointing to see such average work. Something I think we can all relate to — I hope.

Before deciding to conduct this experiment I set out with the intention of failing, which, I think I did. I’ll probably give it another shot and try a few things differently. But maybe…just maybe…one day Bruce Gilden, or somebody else will conduct The Discarted Experiment. I don’t know — is the quality of the work that good? Good enough to inspire somebody?

To see more photos captured during The Bruce Gilden Experiment click here.

To see my usual style go here.

To see the amazing work of Bruce Gilden go here.

To see a wonderful short of Bruce Gilden in action go here.

Tourists Will Be Free (Sort of) to Take Photos of Pentagon Memorial


Photo via Unknown

Here’s an interesting conundrum. The Pentagon will dedicate its 9/11 memorial in September on the grounds of one of the most secretive government complexes in the country. So then how to deal with the ensuing round-the-clock tourists – all no doubt carrying cameras?

 

In this article from Washingtonpost.com, Nick Miroff reports that the Pentagon is preparing to somewhat relax its strict policies regarding photography, and that means allowing people to take pictures of the building from within the memorial site (but not outside of it).

 

The challenge for government officials, Miroff writes, is to create “a visible enforcement presence that discourages threats while not making visitors uncomfortable with an overwhelming police presence.”

 

It’s not overwhelming as long as they don’t know it, right? There will be “state-of-the-art surveillance equipment” on the site.

 

And, of course, security can confiscate any cameras as they see fit.

 

Sounds like a scenario ripe for confrontations, but more power to them if they can make it work.

 

Article from Washington Post.

Miami Throws the Book at Photog


Photo by discarted

Carlos Miller was in a Miami court this week fighting for his constitutional rights. The freelance photographer was arrested in February 2007 for three misdemeanors (disobeying a police officer, disorderly conduct and resisting arrest without violence) while taking photos of police activity on Biscayne Boulevard.

Oh his blog, Miller writes that Judge Jose L. Fernandez apparently didn’t like his attitude in court and otherwise, so he gave him the harshest sentence possible – even though the prosecutor recommended just three months of probation and court costs. Miller got one year of probation, 100 hours of community service, anger management class and a fine of $540.50.

Judge Fernandez called Miller out for his lack of remorse and accused him of intentionally getting arrested to write about it on his blog and become a hero. Judge Fernandez said he should visit Arlington Cemetery to see some real heroes.

This response is so extremely tired – this blanket “veterans/military/we fought for you” crap. It’s amazing how often this is used by law enforcement and government officials. It happened last month to Discarted when he was approached by security guards for taking photos in the LA subway.

On top of that, after having my photo taken, Officer ******* then asked me if I was in the military and I said, “No, I don’t believe in the military.” He then exploded and said, “I fucking built this land you’re standing on! Get outta here!” 

So by implication, anyone who hasn’t served in the military doesn’t have the right to question the law or enjoy the protections of the constitution? That rationale has more holes than Miami’s porous border.

You can send your thoughts on what it is to be a hero to Judge Fernandez:

Court Administrator’s Office
Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse Center
175 NW 1st Ave Suite 3016
Miami, FL 33128


Spam Blocked