Posts Tagged 'Julie Jacobson'

Photography Link Roundup


Photo by “Mike” Michael L. Baird/flickr.bairdphotos.com

• AP photographer Julie Jacobson wins the top Military Reporters & Editors award for her photos of a marine’s death. Also: Chad Hunt wins for his Popular Mechanics photo essay of a military mission called Thunder 2. [MRE]

• Rock photographer Danny Clinch talks Bob Dylan, the Boss and Mary Ellen Mark in this interview on the T Magazine blog. [T Magazine/New York Times]

• Yemeni native and International Center of Photography student Amira Al Sharif has embarked on “Unveiling Misconceptions,” a one-year project to document the lives of American women in their 20s, and she’s raising funds here. [Boing Boing]

• Biologists identify a humpback whale on a 6,000 mile journey thanks to Flickr photos. [New York Times]

• Because embarrassment and shame shouldn’t be kept private — a web site devoted to those “not-so-hot photos” of your youth. [Before You Were Hot]

Who Gets to Decide Who Sees War Photos?

This past week saw a lot of discussion about the AP’s decision to run a photo of a mortally wounded marine. Some, including Defense Secretary Robert Gates, balked – he called their insensitivity “appalling.” Others felt it was a true depiction of war, which is – of course – brutal. Regardless, the images that are coming out of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are nowhere near as searing or evocative as those seen in the Vietnam era. This could be my perception, undoubtedly clouded by the fact that I distrust the government that got us into the mess in the first place, but when photos of coffins of dead soldiers have been banned, you know that we’re not getting the full story.

The controversial photo shows Cpl. Joshua Bernard with his legs severely mangled (or gone) after he was hit by a grenade in an ambush in Afghanistan in August. He died soon after. The photographer, Julie Jacobson, later wrote in her journal about showing the marine’s comrades the photos she’d taken that day:

“They did stop when they came to that moment,” she said. “But none of them complained or grew angry about it. They understood that it was what it was. They understand, despite that he was their friend, it was the reality of things.”

Incidentally, the AP held the photo for three weeks before deciding to publish it. And those who think it was a decision based on sensationalism or money are, I believe, woefully misinformed. Apart from Gates and the military and family objections, I’d really be interested to hear what soldiers fighting over there think – if they object to real and raw, sometimes gruesome, images coming out, or if they see them as a testament to their sacrifice and tangible evidence that real lives are being lost every day.

In his blog, journalist and ASU professor Tim McGuire hits the nail on the head – and he doesn’t think families get to decide what photos are seen in the media.

In Salon, Michael Winship thinks the photo reminds us of a war that’s now gone on longer than World War I and II combined.

Watch a photo montage of the day of the ambush, narrated by Julie Jacobson here.

By the way, if you haven’t seen The Hurt Locker, you should.



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers

%d bloggers like this: