Internal LAPD Email Raises Questions

Screen Shot 2014-01-06 at 11.33.16 AM

After reading Carlos Miller’s article yesterday regarding cops warning cops about citizens with cameras, it seemed relative to share a similar email from one of the Los Angeles Police Department’s Commanding Officers.  But in order to get to that part of the timeline, I first need to clarify some things.

In June 2013, I was unlawfully arrested for photographing LAPD officers from a public street.  The video was made public in August by Reason.com.  LAPD was contacted by various media outlets and started commenting on what happened to me (such as here).  After reading what Lt. Andy Neiman was saying, I figured that the cogs were turning internally at LAPD—that the department was trying to get all their ducks in a row in order to justify handcuffing me to a bench for taking pictures in public.  So instead of sitting back and doing nothing, I began making public records requests for email communications regarding “Shawn Nee”.

I received a good amount of email communication, including Lt. Andy Neiman’s redacted email (he’s the guy who did the media interviews regarding my arrest).  And from my experience, a redacted email generally means it’s inculpatory.  I mean, cops always say…if you have nothing to hide

So why redact or hide an email?  What is it that you don’t want the public to see?

NEIMAN REDACTED(click to enlarge)

Besides receiving Neiman’s communications, emails between Bea Girmala and Cory Palka were also turned over.  For clarification purposes, Ms. Girmala is no longer the Captain III of Hollywood Division.  I was told that she was demoted/moved/given a new position/title because of all the problems that had occurred in Hollywood during 2013.

Anyhow, here is one of Ms. Girmala’s emails that caught my attention:

BEA-GIRMALA-EMAIL2

As you can see, someone named Mike emailed Girmala to express his concerns about my arrest and his feelings regarding abusive police behavior.  Girmala’s response to this man was not included in my public records request, so I’m not sure if she ever contacted Mike.  But what I found interesting, was her response to Cory Palka.  Which said the following:

“Hi- plz ensure that officers are aware someone may try this again…thanks”

What did she mean by this: “…someone may try this again”

Try what again?  Take pictures in public space?  Photograph police?  Videotape police making an illegal arrest?

I don’t know, but Girmala’s email makes it seem like that I went out on June 2 to intentionally target police that day in order to capture their unlawful behavior on video.  And that other people will now try to do what I supposedly did?  I can’t speak for other people’s future actions, but LAPD’s theory on what I was doing the day I was arrested is so far from reality (a fact that is based on other things besides Girmala’s email).

I also can’t say what Ms. Girmala meant in her email, but to me, her email makes it seem like that she’s more concerned about officers being caught on camera violating people’s rights and making unlawful arrests than she is with officers obeying the law and understanding constitutional rights.  If I’m wrong, Ms. Girmala can contact me at any time and explain what she meant in her email.  I’m sure the public would like clarification.

More importantly, and just as upsetting, is the fact that despite receiving numerous LAPD emails through my public records requests, not one single person within those emails spoke up and said,

“This is wrong.  What our officers did to Mr. Nee is unlawful and we need to handle this appropriately.”

There was nothing like that — at all.

You know, instead of reading an email like the one Girmala wrote, I should’ve seen something like this:

Hi- plz ensure that officers are educated about First Amendment rights and receive proper training regarding people photographing officers performing their duties.  We can’t have something like this happen again. When our officers are caught behaving unlawfully, we lose credibility and the public’s trust. The same laws we enforce on members of the public, also apply to us.

Over the next few weeks, I will be releasing various emails that I’ve obtained through my public records requests.  Some of them are interesting and reveal a few things that the public doesn’t know about.  So I’m glad to share them with the public.

I will also finally release my Halloween videos, which include LAPD threatening me with arrest, violating their own policies numerous times, and an undercover officer intentionally committing battery on me. Actually, it was a cheap shot; the cop came up from behind and threw his shoulder into my back while I was taking pictures and not looking at him.  One of the undercover officers there that night, was in the booking hallway when I was arrested (another officer called her Palmer; I’m guessing that’s her last name).  She is not the cop who hit my body though.

Besides all of that, I’ m gonna attempt to trace all of ISP addresses that visited my website since August.  Any thing that I find out of the ordinary will be made public.

So stay tuned, and I appreciate the support.

About these ads

1 Response to “Internal LAPD Email Raises Questions”


  1. 1 highsider January 14, 2014 at 10:49 am

    I might be totally wrong, but your lawyer should be able to get the non-redacted email for use in your case.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s





Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 110 other followers

%d bloggers like this: